Share
As generative AI tools become commonplace, law firms are increasingly implementing policies to govern their responsible use. While much of the discussion has focused on how partners and associates should handle AI in client work, summer and junior associates in 2025 are also being introduced to explicit rules. Firms view this as an early training opportunity to instill best practices and mitigate risks. For job seekers, understanding what firms expect can help ensure compliance—and demonstrate professionalism—during the summer program and the first crucial months of the first year.
The Rise of AI Policies in Law Firms
In the past year, firms across the Am Law 100 have issued AI-specific guidelines. According to a 2024 survey, over 70% of responding firms reported adopting formal AI policies. These typically include restrictions on uploading client data into public tools, requirements for human review of AI-generated drafts, and mandatory disclosure of AI use.
Summer and junior associates, who may rely on tools like ChatGPT for research or drafting, are now explicitly subject to these policies.
Examples of Firm-Level Expectations
Some firms have made their policies public. Baker McKenzie, for instance, issued a global AI guidance document in 2024 emphasizing human oversight and ethical compliance. Reed Smith similarly launched a firmwide policy requiring pre-approval before using AI on any client matter. For junior or summer associates, these rules mean that casual experimentation with AI tools on assignments could trigger compliance issues if not cleared first.
By contrast, firms like A&O Shearman have piloted internal AI platforms (such as “Harvey”) for controlled use, offering associates exposure to safe, vetted environments.
The Ethical and Practical Risks
For summers, misuse of AI carries heightened risks:
- Confidentiality breaches if client data is entered into public models.
- Accuracy issues since generative AI can “hallucinate” sources.
- Plagiarism and disclosure concerns if AI outputs are not properly attributed.
The ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct already obligate attorneys to maintain competence and confidentiality, which extends to technology use. Summer associates, though not yet licensed, are expected to meet firm standards and uphold professional norms.
How Summer Associates Can Prepare
Students preparing for summer programs should familiarize themselves with the firm’s internal policies before their first day. They should also practice responsible use of AI during law school research—ensuring all outputs are checked against primary sources. Asking mentors or assigning attorneys about best practices shows awareness and professionalism.
Career services offices are beginning to emphasize this as well: the National Association for Law Placement (NALP) has advised law schools to incorporate AI literacy into career preparation.
Implications for Recruiting and Offers
Firms are keenly aware that summer associates represent future hires. Missteps with AI—even unintentional ones—could impact evaluations. Conversely, demonstrating fluency with ethical AI use can be a plus. Candidates who ask thoughtful questions about firm technology policies during interviews or training sessions show they are engaged with the evolving practice environment.
In an industry adapting quickly, being proactive rather than reactive can distinguish a candidate.
***
Generative AI is no longer a novelty—it is a compliance and ethics issue that firms expect even their newest summer associates to understand. In 2025, law students entering summer programs should assume their use of AI will be monitored and regulated. By preparing early and demonstrating sound judgment, they can not only avoid pitfalls but also signal readiness for the profession’s future.
Share
