Share
Summer associate stipends have long been baseline markers of prestige and market clout. In 2025, with inflation and cost-of-living pressures biting harder than usual in coastal legal hubs, several firms are quietly adjusting how they structure stipends, housing support, and related compensation. For students evaluating offers or negotiating, these changes are more than marginal—they reflect how firms are recalibrating incentives and talent competition in high-cost markets.
Shifts in Bonus and Compensation Signals
One clear data point: Milbank recently announced special seniority-based summer bonuses ranging from $6,000 to $25,000, citing heavy work volumes across the firm. These bonus payments supplement base pay and mirror what some firms did mid-year last year.
While this is not strictly a stipend shift, it signals that firms are increasingly willing to deploy variable compensation above and beyond base pay to retain talent under rising cost pressures.
Rising Stipend Expectations vs. Geography
Many students now compare stipend offers not in nominal terms, but as “net stipend minus cost-of-living.” In markets like San Francisco, New York, and Los Angeles, even a generous stipend may hardly cover rent. This differential intensifies the advantage of firms that offer supplemental housing stipends, commute subsidies, or remote/hybrid flexibility. Although few firms publish such adjustments broadly, legal gossip and recruiting forums suggest that smaller firms competing for top students in these markets are quietly experimenting with housing boosts to close the “net stipend gap.”
Because these adjustments often aren’t publicly disclosed, students should actively ask about their offers:
- "Do you provide housing or relocation supplements in this market?"
- "Is there reimbursement for inbound/outbound commuting?"
- "Can the stipend be adjusted in extraordinary cost-of-living zones?"
Early Recruiting, Offer Timing, and Stipend Leverage
The recruiting cycle has accelerated. Many firms are pulling offers well before OCI, narrowing windows for students to compare offers or negotiate. In such compressed timeframes, stipend structure becomes more salient in decision-making.
If a student receives a stipend offer quickly, before seeing alternatives, they lose negotiating leverage. In offers that come early, students should proactively request addenda on housing/hybrid stipends or conditions for supplement adjustments. A firm that resists negotiation may do so as a signal of financial rigidity or standardization rather than flexibility.
Examples of Higher Stipends or Perks
While comprehensive public data is limited, there are a few observable cases and signals:
Milbank’s bonus scheme (above) is a rare high-profile action that acknowledges overwork and cost pressures. Some boutiques and mid-size firms in high-cost cities are rumored to structure “housing subsidies” or assign summer associates to a “living allowance” separate from stipend—these perks often do not appear in published recruiting materials but surface in student reports and firm recruiting discussions. In some markets, firms have advertised hybrid or partial remote summer placements, which allow students to live in lower-cost locations yet still participate fully—effectively increasing net stipend value.
These examples show that compensation innovation is already underway, even if quietly.
What Students Should Do
Ask explicitly: When getting offers, include a stipend worksheet breaking down base stipend, housing allowance, commuting support, and any bonus potential.
Project net cost: Use local rental data to subtract your estimated housing, utilities, and transit costs from your stipend to see real value.
Negotiate early, politely, and in writing: A polite ask for an incremental housing supplement or relocation bonus often succeeds—especially when supported by data (e.g., “I found average studio rent in city is $2,800/month”).
Use market signals: Reference Milbank’s special bonus or known high-cost subsidies in peer firms as justification—these demonstrate precedence in the market.
Compare across offers: Two stipends that are $10,000 apart may end up being much closer once adjustments are added; look for firms that provide flexibility in stipend structures.
***
In 2025, stipend negotiation is no longer perfunctory—it's a frontline battleground in summer recruitment. Students must actively probe base vs. supplemental compensation, cost-of-living burdens, and hybrid options. Because some firms already recognize the need to adjust in high-cost markets, asking these questions isn’t pushing too far—it’s expected. Get clarity before accepting, because what you think is generous on paper may not survive your rent bill.
Share
