Share
Over the past few recruiting cycles, a subtle but meaningful shift has gained momentum: more law firms—especially mid-size and boutique firms—are choosing not to participate in traditional OCI cycles, instead relying on return offer pipelines, earlier hiring, or summer-to-hire conversion. Although we've discussed off-cycle recruiting in past posts, this article focuses specifically on how firms’ decisions to bypass OCI are perceived by students and laterals, and what candidates should evaluate before joining such firms.
The Decline of OCI Dominance in 2025
OCI (On-Campus Interviewing) remains significant but is no longer uncontested. According to NALP’s 2024 data, 82% of law offices still recruit via OCI—a decline from prior years.
Moreover, recent recruiting commentary suggests BigLaw firms are increasingly “leaving OCI in the dust,” favoring alternative or direct hiring paths to lock in talent earlier and reduce uncertainty. In this environment, firms that do not participate in OCI are not necessarily outliers—they are positioning on a different recruiting axis, and candidates must understand the implications.
How Students View Firms that Skip OCI
Anecdotal reporting and student forums reflect mixed perceptions:
Risk perception: Some students interpret non-OCI firms as "less serious" or less prestigious, reasoning that firms too small or under-resourced avoid formal recruiting cycles.
Counterarguments: Students also acknowledge that skipping OCI can reflect speed, decisiveness, or a boutique’s confidence in its pipeline. For example, a boutique may depend heavily on its summer class to self-fill, making external competition less relevant.
Insider preferences: Students eye return-rate metrics more critically—if a non-OCI firm traditionally hires 80–90% of its summers, it reduces perceived risk.
Many law school career offices advise students to treat non-OCI firms as “insider plays”: you must show genuine knowledge, follow firm alumni, and engage directly rather than relying on mass recruiting mechanics.
These dynamics differ from generic off-cycle hiring conversations because the risk judgment is more psychological than structural.
Laterals and the Non-OCI Firm Challenge
Lateral attorneys evaluate firms on client platforms, compensation, partner climb, and reputation. When a firm bypasses OCI, laterals may worry about:
Perceived selectivity: Are they skipping OCI because they can’t compete in volume recruiting, or because they thrive on selective pipelines?
Network visibility: Firms in OCI get exposure among all top-tier students. Non-OCI firms may be less central in candidate rankings, making it harder for laterals to assess strength.
Comparability difficulties: When evaluating a non-OCI firm, a lateral must dig deeper into summer-to-associate conversion rates, client work, and development structure—metrics generally less publicly available than at full-cycle firms.
Experienced recruiters caution laterals to treat offers from non-OCI firms as one element among many—firm culture, deal flow, platform matters, and growth must carry weight beyond recruiting mechanics.
What Questions Candidates Should Ask Before Joining
For law students or laterals considering non-OCI firms, here are critical questions to surface real promise vs. hidden risk:
What’s your summer-to-associate conversion rate in the past 5 years?
High conversion suggests consistency, while low rates signal unpredictability.
What is your pipeline for new deal/client work?
If your role depends primarily on legacy work, this can mean less certainty in the security of your role.
What is your visibility and branding strategy?
Do you publish, sponsor events, and/or engage in law school outreach—despite not doing OCI?
How do you recruit new talent?
Are offers extended via referrals, alumni channels, or vacancy postings? Are there “quiet” rounds?
What is your growth or exit strategy?
Is the firm planning scale, merger, or specialization? What are the factors that affect your long-term trajectory?
Asking these gives insight beyond superficial prestige. Firms that don’t use OCI but are transparent about pipeline and retention signal confidence; those that evade such questions should raise caution.
Advantages & Disadvantages of Skipping OCI
Advantages:
Flexibility: Firms free of the OCI calendar can make targeted offers based on real need, not mass quotas.
Cost and optics control: Avoiding formal recruiting reduces overhead and allows positioning around preferred candidates.
Talent loyalty: It encourages candidates to engage directly and demonstrates that the firm wants people who truly choose them, rather than passing through a recruiting funnel.
Disadvantages/Risks:
Perception bias: Passive students may overlook the firm because it's not “on the grid.”
Limited exposure: Non-OCI firms may miss branding in the law school ecosystem; fewer students will organically discover them.
Recruitment pressure: If summer hire conversion is not high, this may indicate that the firm underfills or overcommits hires based on inaccurate forecasts.
***
Firms that skip OCI in favor of return offers or direct hiring are not fringe—they are embracing a strategic recruiting posture, often shaped by scale, culture, or specialization. For candidates, understanding how such firms operate—and how to evaluate them—is critical. Non-OCI doesn’t mean uncompetitive; it means higher risk and responsibility in vetting. But with the right questions and data, you can determine whether a non-OCI firm offers not just a job but a strong foundation for growth.
Share
