Skip to Main Content
Overview

Attorneys in this area serve as advisors and represent companies and individuals arising out of labor and employment disputes. The “labor” side deals with union issues, advising companies on avoiding unionization of their workers, negotiating collective bargaining agreements, administering labor contracts, and litigating issues arising from union issues, including cases alleging unfair labor practice charges. On the employment side, attorneys advise companies on day-to-day employment issues, draft policies and procedures, develop and sometimes conduct trainings, draft employment and separation agreements, and litigate cases dealing with employment issues—including charges of discrimination before the EEOC or similar state agency or via individual suits. L&E law relies heavily on state law, so many firms in this area are local, but there are—of course—larger firms who focus on this area. L&E attorneys are well situated to go in-house because every company, no matter the industry, deals with labor and/or employment issues and nearly every in-house department includes one or more attorneys who have practiced in this area.

Featured Q&A's
Get an insider's view on working in Labor & Employment from real lawyers in the practice area.
Felicia Davis, Partner—Employment Litigation
Paul Hastings LLP

Describe your practice area and what it entails.

As an employment lawyer, I work with some of the country’s largest employers to advise on all aspects of the employment relationship. This means I help employers resolve disputes that involve everything from hiring, promotions, pay, and wage and hour issues to concerns about working conditions, difficult leave and workplace accommodation questions, and employee terminations. Employment lawyers also help employers protect their trade secrets by preventing employees from taking confidential information from one company to another. Beyond litigation and disputes, employment lawyers are involved in advice and counseling work, such as helping companies develop best practices for promotion or performance systems, creating more diverse and inclusive workplaces, and advising on layoffs and employment reductions.

What types of clients do you represent?

Companies of all sizes and in every industry grapple with employment law issues, so employment lawyers tend to represent a broad range of clients. Given that I primarily work in California, I represent many employers in the entertainment, media, and technology industries, but my practice is very broad, and I have represented companies in manufacturing, retail, and other sectors as well. Some of my more recent clients include The Walt Disney Company, Nike, Google and ByteDance (TikTok).

What types of cases/deals do you work on?

We are a Chambers Band 1 employment practice, so clients tend to come to us for their most business-critical employment issues. In my own practice, I tend to work on high-stakes discrimination class actions, whether that involves pay discrimination or disputes over promotion practices and hiring. These are important cases that target an employer’s employment practices. For example, I have handled cases involving allegations that an employer has paid women less than men for the same work or others in which employees from historically underrepresented groups are paid less or placed in lower-level roles than those in historical majority groups.

These types of cases are heavily statistics-driven, and I often work closely with labor economists and other experts to analyze pay and promotion data to not only defend the case but also to determine whether any existing issues should be corrected.

How did you choose this practice area?

Before law school, I worked for five years in a management training program for a large industrial supply distribution firm where I ran different parts of the business. I was involved in operations from top to bottom, from hiring and performance management to terminations. I thought that employment law was something that I understood well and found interesting, and I knew it would give me many options to pursue in my legal career, whether it was at a BigLaw firm like Paul Hastings, a smaller boutique firm, or in-house.

I specifically focused on discrimination class actions after I started working on these cases early in my legal career. I enjoy working on these cases because they are high-stakes and critical for our clients to defend, and in working on them, I get to help employers ensure their practices are fair and equitable. As I mentioned before, these cases involve a lot of statistical analysis, so I also enjoy the fact that I get to exercise the math part of my brain in addition to the lawyer part.

What is a “typical” day like and/or what are some common tasks you perform?

There are no “typical days” as an employment lawyer. I’m often working on multiple complex cases during the same day, constantly switching between different cases and clients. However, some of the common tasks I perform involve advising clients about difficult HR matters, preparing witnesses for depositions, and working with experts on data analysis. At Paul Hastings, we focus on client service and collaboration, so I am often working closely with my team—including mentoring junior attorneys from day one—to develop and implement litigation strategies.

What training, classes, experience, or skills development would you recommend to someone who wishes to enter your practice area?

Strong writing skills are important to being a good litigator in general, so experience in any type of written advocacy work will be key to success. Specifically, because we tend to interact with and interview a wide range of witnesses, from the CEO of a company to an assembly worker on a manufacturing line, it is critical that attorneys in the employment space can communicate well and empathize with people from a variety of different backgrounds.

As for classes that have stuck with me, the class I took in law school that has been the most applicable to my work as an employment litigator was a Deposition Skills clinic. I still use the techniques I learned in that class when I take depositions to this day.

What is the most challenging aspect of practicing in this area?

This challenge may not be unique to employment law, but as a lawyer, you are often asked to help clients solve problems that existed long before you were involved or have not been addressed properly. The facts are what they are, and some-times our job is to help clients execute on the “least bad” option. This requires an understanding of what’s important to the individual client in that moment. Not every client has the same business needs and priorities, so the challenge becomes identifying my client’s largest priorities and figuring out how to prioritize and accomplish their most important ones when achieving all their goals is impossible. This is also a lot of fun.

What do you like best about your practice area?

I really enjoy helping my clients solve issues before they devolve into a dispute or litigation so that, hopefully, the employee and the employer can find a resolution that works for both. I also really enjoy working with companies to evaluate and, at times, modify their business practices to create fair and equitable workplaces and deliver real and impactful change for them and their employees.

I also love the fact that I get to work with lots of types of companies. As I mentioned, virtually every company in every sector will have employment needs and issues, and I love learning about different industries and types of business that I’ve never worked with before. It’s amazing how many companies are critical to our day-to-day lives that fly below the radar. It is so much fun to learn what they do and help them operate at their best.

What misconceptions exist about your practice area?

A misconception about defense-side employment lawyers is that you are working to protect bad actors that allow harmful and discriminatory practices to exist. That has not been my experience at all. Throughout my time practicing in this area, I’ve had a significant impact on ensuring that companies create, modify, and uphold policies that are more inclusive and equitable, as well as those that safeguard equal opportunities for all. Our impact is perhaps even bigger than that of a plaintiff’s lawyer since, through our work, we build and maintain relationships with our clients that give us the unique ability to help drive meaningful change. They trust us, and when we give advice, they listen.

How do you see this practice area evolving in the future?

Growing adoption and implementation of AI will drive a lot of what we do in the employment space in the future. More companies are integrating AI into their employment practices, including hiring, performance evaluation and promotion decisions, even terminations, and I don’t anticipate that this will slow down anytime soon. This is a seismic shift in the employment legal landscape, bringing the potential for significant disputes and precedent-setting litigation, as well as

changes in the laws and regulation that govern this space. I think young law students and lawyers who are interested in learning about and understanding AI, as well as how this technology will interact with existing anti-discrimination and privacy laws, will find employment law to be a field that is interesting and open for them to make an impact.

Felicia Davis is a partner in Paul Hastings’ employment law department and is based in the firm’s Los Angeles and San Francisco offices. Her practice focuses on pay equity and discrimination class actions as well as systemic government investigations. She has led the defense of some of the largest matters across the country. Her clients span all industries, with an emphasis in media, entertainment, and technology.

Felicia also represents employers in other employment law matters, including single plaintiff pay equity, discrimination, retaliation, harassment, and religious accommodation cases. She handles single-plaintiff and class action wage and hour matters. In addition, Felicia represents clients in background check litigation under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, conducts workplace investigations, and handles labor grievances and collective bargaining.

In addition to litigation, Felicia regularly advises employers on their employment policies and procedures, including policies on employee background checks, paid sick leave, and wage and hour issues, and provides anti-harassment training to management and executives. She works with employers to review and analyze their hiring, compensation, and promotion practices for equity and legal compliance and advises on ESG reporting and diversity programs.

Tristan Morales, Partner—Labor & Employment
O'Melveny & Myers LLP

Describe your practice area and what it entails.

There are three broad components in my practice. First, I’m an airline labor lawyer who represents aviation industry clients on matters that often involve the Railway Labor Act. Second is my class action litigation work, which can involve a variety of employment statutes and federal employment laws.

Third is my work with our Diversity Task Force, which we launched in 2023 to help companies respond to the evolving legal environment in the wake of the Supreme Court’s rulings restricting affirmative action, scrutiny from state Attorneys General, and increasing challenges from civil litigants. I’ve worked on all parts of the advisory, litigation, and consultation stages, and found the auditing process has been a big part of my practice in recent years.

What types of clients do you represent?

The aviation work involves airline clients. We have the great fortune to have a long-standing relationship with a number of airline clients. I work with clients like American Airlines, United Airlines, Alaska Airlines, and Southwest Airlines.

My Diversity Task Force work includes airline clients, but also a range of other industries, such as venture capital. Clients in a really wide range of industries are looking to us for guidance on that emerging landscape.

What types of cases/deals do you work on?

We’ve had a number of employment class action matters involving pilots who are military reservists. There is an interesting set of issues involving the pay and benefits that are required for pilots working unique airline pilot schedules when they are also serving on military reserve duty. Our group has been at the forefront of those cases as they have worked their way through the federal district and appeals courts over the last few years. As an example, two of our USERRA class action matters for airlines reached the federal appeals courts: Scanlan v. American Airlines in the Third Circuit and Clarkson v. Alaska Airlines in the Ninth Circuit.

The Diversity Task Force involves a wider range of work talking to clients on the front end about the legal landscape, reviewing their policies, and managing related investigations or litigation. 

How did you choose this practice area?

I kept an open mind when I started at O’Melveny and tried to work in as many different areas and on as many different projects as I could. I didn’t have any labor experience or aviation experience. About 18 months into my time here, I took a project on an aviation labor matter with Aparna Joshi, who is a labor airline partner in Washington, DC. I loved the work, and essentially didn’t look back in terms of the core aviation labor work that’s part of my practice today.

What is a typical day like and/or what are some common tasks you perform?

My typical day really depends on which of the three buckets of work that I mentioned is front and center on that particular day. For example, one thing that is unique with our airline labor clients is that federal law requires that contract disputes go to experienced labor arbitrators in what are called system board arbitrations. When those are happening, they’re essentially trials that occur on a very expedited basis without a lot of discovery. In those cases, I’m getting ready to present opening statements and conduct direct examinations and cross examinations.

In contrast, our class action litigation work tends to be more long-standing matters, with complex strategic issues that evolve over a course of years. We may be getting ready for depositions, preparing for motion practice, or dealing with issues on appeal.

The Diversity Task Force work for clients can range from full audits of all of their policies to phone calls to discuss a specific set of policies or developments, or I can be dealing with litigation matters that can present a longer potential time frame.

What training, classes, experience, or skills development would you recommend to someone who wishes to enter your practice area?

I did not take any labor or aviation classes in law school. So, I don’t think it’s a prerequisite to enter this area of practice. I would suggest working on core skills like legal writing, thinking about asking good questions, and attention to detail. It’s also helpful to have an open mind to learn as you’re jumping into new projects as a young lawyer or new member of the team, particularly to understand your client’s business. But, at least in my experience, there are no prerequisites to start on day one in a practice like this one.

What do you like best about your practice area?

The airline industry is continually interesting and changing. Our clients are always focused on new destinations, new routes, and new aircraft. It’s an industry that moves people all around the country and is very tied into a lot of people’s lives. Building long-standing relationships with clients in such a dynamic industry has been a really fun way for me to practice law.

What is unique about your practice area at your firm?

One of the unique things about our practice is the labor arbitrations that are required by federal law. The labor arbitrations that the Railway Labor Act requires for any contract disputes lead to quick-moving trials. This in turn creates opportunities for young lawyers to draft or deliver opening statements and conduct direct examinations and cross-examinations—experiences that might not otherwise be available in long-standing, multi-year litigation matters.

What kinds of experiences can summer associates gain at this practice area at your firm?

This area offers a great opportunity for summers to gain direct experience in our airline labor arbitrations. We had a summer associate who worked on a research memo for a very fast-moving and interesting labor arbitration who has now started as an associate at the firm. The timing coincided so that she was with us on day one of the arbitration and the arbitrator actually called out a special welcome to her. She sat with the client—and was able to see how the work that she had done was being put into practice. That’s a unique opportunity for summers at O’Melveny—to potentially have the chance to experience a live case they’ve directly contributed to.

Tristan Morales is an accomplished labor and employment partner and class action litigator. His cutting-edge work for major airlines spans the Railway Labor Act (RLA) and Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA), among a range of other statutory and contractual matters. As a leader of O’Melveny’s Diversity Task Force, Tristan also has extensive experience advising employers on challenges to corporate diversity programs, including on matters arising under Section 1981 and Title VII. Tristan was named a “Rising Star” in transportation law by Law360 in 2021. His well-recognized experience in the airline industry includes federal court litigation, including more than a half-dozen recent class actions under USERRA and a host of novel high-stakes matters under the RLA.

He has first-chaired labor arbitrations before RLA System Boards of Adjustment and advised airlines on airline transactions, including as to “scope” provisions in airline labor CBAs. His class action experience also includes matters under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), as well as consumer class action litigation. A past Pathfinder of the Leadership Council on Legal Diversity (LCLD), Tristan currently serves on the board of directors for the Washington Urban Debate League.

Alexandra Stathopoulos, Partner
Orrick

Describe your practice area and what it entails.

I defend employers in class, collective, and representative actions that can involve hundreds or even thousands of putative class members. I also handle high-stakes, single-plaintiff claims of discrimination, harassment, and/or retaliation. One of my favorite aspects of this practice is strategizing with employers on how to comply with the varied and ever-changing employment laws, including implementing policies and advising on personnel matters to avoid litigation.

What types of clients do you represent? 

I represent a wide variety of clients including technology and life sciences companies, financial institutions, and retail companies. In addition to large, established companies, I have helped many start-up and emerging companies. 

What types of cases/deals do you work on? 

I’m managing several wage-and-hour class actions and representative actions and handling a single-plaintiff contract dispute and a couple of arbitrations. I have also been helping numerous employers adapt their policies in light of new laws the California legislature passed and developing case law that affects employers.

How did you choose this practice area?

When I joined Orrick as a summer associate in 2010, I specifically did NOT want to do employment law because my career before law school involved strategic employee communications, and it felt like too much of the same thing. But when I met the fabulous people on Orrick’s employment team, I just knew that these were the lawyers and staff members I wanted as my teachers, mentors, and colleagues. I have never regretted it!

What is a typical day like and/or what are some common tasks you perform?

There really isn’t a typical day—some days I might spend the whole day taking a deposition, prepping a witness to testify, conducting a fact investigation or interviewing witnesses, negotiating a settlement at mediation, or appearing at court for a hearing. A day in the office might consist of a few hours of email; a couple of hours reviewing the work of associates on my team and strategizing about our cases; one or two calls with clients to provide counseling and advice on employment issues; calls with opposing counsel to meet and confer over various litigation issues; and (if I’m lucky) a few hours of focused work on briefs, preparing for a deposition or strategizing about substantive discovery responses. 

What training, classes, experience, or skills development would you recommend to someone who wishes to enter your practice area?

Apart from research and writing, law school generally does not focus on litigation skills, but these skills are critically important to practicing employment law. I’m very grateful for the practical-skills courses I took in law school (Depositions, Civil Trial Practice, Arbitrations) and that I signed up for every advocacy opportunity I could get my hands on (negotiations team, mock trial, moot court). These experiences made me feel prepared when I was given early “at bats” at Orrick, and I was able to demonstrate that I can handle myself in high-pressure situations. I also highly recommend befriending and learning from experienced staff members wherever you work. As a junior attorney, I learned so much about the mechanics of filings, assembling evidence, and court protocols from senior paralegals, our calendar department, and my legal secretary.

What is unique about your practice area at your firm?

Orrick’s Employment practice is a very special place. In addition to the marvelous people, the Employment group gives early opportunities to associates who demonstrate a desire and readiness for them. I took my first deposition as a second-year associate and drafted my first motion for summary judgment—the whole thing—that year as well. (We won.) I asked to attend mediations and to argue in court, and most often the answer was “yes.” These were the kinds of opportunities I dreamt about when I went to law school, and I feel very lucky to have found a place where they were available to me. Now, as a partner, I pay it forward by providing early “at bats” to associates so they can hone their skills.

How do you see this practice area evolving in the future?

Employment law is such an exciting area to practice in because the laws are always changing (especially here in California!) and the ways we work constantly evolve. Right now, some of the hot areas in employment law are arbitration; independent contractor classification; the impact artificial intelligence will have on the employment relationship; remote and flexible working arrangements; the gig economy; issues of gender equity (including pay and parental leave/caregiver status); the #MeToo movement and sex harassment; building strong and comprehensive Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs; and health and safety in light of the COVID-19 pandemic—and the list goes on and on. I can’t say exactly how the practice will evolve, but if I look into my crystal ball, I’d say rain or shine, there will be plenty of work for employment lawyers to do!

What are some typical career paths for lawyers in this practice area?

Employment lawyers have many career options. Becoming a law firm partner is one option, but many of my colleagues have also gone on to rewarding careers as in-house employment counsel, government attorneys, professors, or judges.

What advice do you have for junior lawyers in keeping on top of complex labor and employment laws and the changes to these laws?

My advice is: Be patient and let your interests guide you. As a junior attorney, the volume of employment laws on the federal, state, and local level can be overwhelming. Don’t worry. In just a few years of practice, things will start to click. 

That said, we can’t all be masters of everything, so try to find a topic or topics that genuinely interest you, and spend time attending conferences, networking with practitioners within and outside your workplace, reading the legal news, or researching and writing about those areas. If your firm has a research team, work with them to set up email alerts so you can be the first to know when a new case or article or legislation comes out on the topics that interest you. Pretty soon, people will look to you for that subject-matter expertise, and it will become a cornerstone of your practice.

Alex Stathopoulos is an employment attorney in Orrick’s San Francisco office. Alex defends employers in complex wage and hour class, collective, and representative actions, as well as single-plaintiff lawsuits involving discrimination, harassment, and wrongful termination under both California and federal law. Alex also assists employers with pre-dispute demands and administrative complaints and provides creative and practical counseling to companies on a wide range of employment issues, including new and developing areas of the law.

Elena Baca, Partner and Global Department Chair—Employment Law
Paul Hastings LLP

Describe your practice area and what it entails.

With employment law being a core practice area since the firm’s founding, Paul Hastings is a national market leader for complex employment law issues. The firm regularly secures successful outcomes through dispositive motions, at trial or on appeal.

As the chair of Paul Hastings’ Global Employment Law department, I have the honor to collaborate and lead one of the most impressive groups of employment attorneys in the nation that is singularly focused on serving its clients. We are known for our thought-leadership role on evolving, timely, and cutting-edge legal issues related to employment. My practice ranges from advising on employment issues impacting the C-suite to complicated, high-profile litigation and class actions asserted against some of the most recognized companies in the world. “Complexity” can mean many things. At times, it means the sheer number of plaintiffs (certified or potential classes consisting of thousands of people). On other occasions, especially in recent years, it means we are addressing unsettled areas of law—for example, navigating the COVID-19 legislation as it was drafted and implemented. It could also mean the sheer amount of potential liability—or potential associated negative press—that may render the matter complicated and require a multifaceted approach.

What types of clients do you represent?

My clients include talent agencies, entertainment companies, web-based services, online social media and networking platforms, video game developers and publishers, financial institutions, medical technology and research companies, law firms, public utilities, major manufacturers, and leading consumer brands. Specifically, some of my key clients include Activision Blizzard; Creative Artists Agency, LLC; Caesars Entertainment; Dollar Tree; Family Dolla;, Facebook; Gilead Sciences; Goldman Sachs; Live Nation; Mattel; Montage Resorts; Pacific Gas & Electric; and Ticketmaster.

What types of cases/deals do you work on?

I work on company-critical legal issues. While much of my time is spent as a trial attorney—averaging at least one trial/arbitration that goes to verdict annually—I also represent clients in regulatory proceedings. The substantive breadth of my practice includes collaborating with company leadership and in-house counsel as they address EEO issues and claims, whistleblower/retaliation claims, and wage and hour claims, both on an individual and class basis. Additionally, I am frequently called upon to turn around cases after significant motions have been lost or mishandled by other law firms, particularly when cases are headed to trial.

How did you choose this practice area?

My practice area chose me. I practiced general litigation when I graduated from law school and then proceeded to a Federal Court Clerkship. When my clerkship ended, I returned to private practice and again focused on general litigation. Sometime after my clerkship ended, I joined Paul Hastings. While I began in litigation, I found I was most interested in employment law, and the area provided me with the most opportunity. I requested (and was permitted) to join the Employment Department. This opportunity—to join an employment practice led by some of the most accomplished practitioners in the field—changed the entire course of my professional career.

What is a typical day like and/or what are some common tasks you perform?

I am an early riser. I take advantage of that quiet time to respond to colleagues and clients and move forward the pressing projects we have underway. I look ahead at my calendar and schedule to determine which of my teams I need to coordinate with and in what order. Depending upon our pending matters, I might prepare to spend the day in court, in depositions, traveling for meetings, or drafting at my desk. As the Chair of the Global Employment practice, I look at department goals, productivity, and our performance as a team and contributions to the firm. Throughout the day, I interact with the teams of lawyers collaborating with me to serve our clients. In the evenings, I spend time with work colleagues and clients. At times, we have dinners, game nights, or participate in various community and bar events.

What training, classes, experience, or skills development would you recommend to someone who wishes to enter your practice area?

I recommend taking an employment law or labor law course in law school. Advanced civil procedure and legal writing and analysis courses are also beneficial. Becoming proficient in legal research is a must. In addition to Lexis and Westlaw, there are newly evolving AI research tools and data forensic tools being used more frequently in the practice of law. Someone entering the practice of law should become familiar with the tools and their functionalities and be prepared for the practice of law to integrate more technology as it looks to secure more efficiencies. I also recommend developing public speaking skills, especially for those interested in labor & employment. Attorneys work in teams, so everyone on the team must be able to effectively communicate to move the overall project forward. No matter what practice area someone is entering into, it is important to be good at logistics and task management. New lawyers should understand how to break apart an entire process into steps—delegating, communicating, and keeping tasks moving.

What are some typical tasks that a junior lawyer would perform in this practice area?

Junior associates are responsible for a wide range of tasks throughout the entire litigation process, starting with initial fact investigation (scheduling and conducting witness interviews, document collection, and review), research, and preparation of responsive pleadings. Within the discovery phase, junior attorneys are responsible for preparing initial drafts of discovery requests and preparing for depositions (including document review and preparation of outlines). Junior lawyers are also heavily involved in motion practice, including performing legal research and preparing initial drafts of briefings. Even at the trial phase, junior associates are involved as part of the trial team, and may be responsible for preparing witness outlines, research for briefing, and assisting with preparation of trial motions. If a junior associate wants to bolster a particular skill or have a particular experience, all they have to do is ask.

How do you see this practice area evolving in the future?

The common misconception people have when they think of employment law, is that they tend to think of single-plaintiff cases involving a single issue. That is not the typical paradigm of employment work we are fortunate enough to secure. As an employment practice unsurpassed in the market, we have the opportunity to serve our clients on their most complicated, headline-grabbing, sensitive matters. As the world evolves and prioritizes employment and social issues, segments of the employment practice have moved to the forefront of corporate board focus as well as the plaintiff’s board. Based on our recent experience, private litigation is not to the exclusion of state regulatory activity. The fact pattern here presents an array of issues currently of interest to the state: pay equity, arbitration agreements, and PAGA civil penalties. We have seen regulatory agencies insert themselves in private litigation and have successfully represented companies in facing a shifting, aggressive regulatory landscape at the state and federal levels.

What kinds of experience can summer associates gain at this practice area at your firm?

The summer program within the Employment Law Department is an immersive program that previews the type of work that associates can expect when they start at the firm (e.g., legal research and writing, fact investigation, document collection and review, etc.). In addition, there is a heavy emphasis on observational learning during the summer, including opportunities to attend depositions, mediation, court hearings, and even trials. Summer associates also participate in mock litigation work (e.g., deposition) to practice these skills on their own. Social events are also built into the summer program to allow new associates the opportunity to meet and get to know the department.

What advice do you have for junior lawyers in keeping on top of complex labor and employment laws and the changes to these laws?

Notably, the largest line item in a company is typically labor and employment expenses. Approximately 60 years ago, there were very few claims that an employee might be permitted to bring against an employer. They might bring a claim for breach of contract, but the employment relationship was not as highly regulated as it is today. As employment law evolved, Paul Hastings became the industry leader. With that history in mind, it is important for junior lawyers to understand the evolution of labor & employment law—how it developed and where it is going. It is important to stay informed and sensitive to the technological, social, and political influences that impact the degree to which the workplace may be regulated, as well as the evolving concept of what work and/or the workplace is. My advice for junior lawyers is to subscribe to legal publications cataloging recent employment trial and appellate decisions and to track proposed and passed legislation. The more you know about the evolution of employment law, the better able you will be to understand the current state of the law as you walk in the door on your first day of work.

Elena Baca is the Global Chair of the Paul Hastings Employment Law Department.

Elena’s litigation practice is primarily focused on employment-related issues, such as employee mobility, discrimination, wage and hour, and whistleblower issues. An experienced trial lawyer, Ms. Baca has established an impressive record of defense verdicts and arbitration wins representing a wide variety of corporate clients. She is considered a “go-to” employment lawyer for many large employers with high-profile disputes involving high-level executives and contentious high-stakes litigation (including class action claims).

Her clients include talent agencies, entertainment companies, web-based services, online social media and networking platforms, video game developers and publishers, financial institutions, medical technology and research companies, law firms, public utilities, major manufacturers, and leading consumer brands.

Related Vault Guides
Check out some of Vault's guides that are related to this field.
Top Ranked Firms
Check out the top-ranked law firms in Labor & Employment.